The Cornered Cat
<— Older Posts Newer Posts —>
Kids say the darnedest things

Before I got married, I had six theories about bringing up children. Now I have six children and no theories. – John Wilmot

When my kids were little, I told them that “gun talk” was kind of like “bathroom talk.” That is, we aren’t ashamed of our firearms and there’s nothing wrong with them, just like there’s nothing wrong or shameful about needing to use the potty sometimes. But other people sometimes feel funny when we talk about those things, so we only talk about them to the people we live with.

That worked for my sons when they were around ages three or four. As they got a little older, and started talking about “bad guys,” I gave them a fantasy-almost-reality idea they could play with: “There might be a bad guy spy around! We should never ever talk about [blah blah blah] so that the bad guy spy won’t find out…”  (This, of course, is the literal truth: we don’t talk about firearms with unknown others because we never know if the sweet person we’re talking to actually has a criminal family member who might be looking for a place to rob.)

I’m pressed for time, so the rest of today’s free ice cream comes in the form of a question for you to answer for each other:

If you have kids, how have you taught your kids not to talk to outside others about your firearms? What tips would you give a young mom on this topic?

Tagged
2 Comments
Lessons from the headlines #6: How _not_ to check out your new holster

Over the years, several people have wondered why I recommend never putting a loaded gun into your new holster right away.

“Wait, what? Did she just say not to use my new holster immediately??”

Why, yes. Yes I did. Never use  your new holster until you have given it a very complete checking-over. Follow this process for checking out a new holster.

Some people say a process like that is finicky, fussy, maybe even a bit paranoid. Definitely unnecessary. However, I suspect that this guy— and his wife — wish he hadn’t been in such a hurry to slam that gun into his new holster.

From the article at the link:

Two people were shot when a man holstering his pistol outside a Chehalis retailer apparently caused it to accidentally discharge today….

The preliminary investigation indicates a gentleman had just purchased a new holster and was putting his gun inside it, Chehalis Police Department Deputy Chief Randy Kaut said.

‘It accidentally discharged and went through his other hand and his wife’s leg,’ Kaut said.

So, let’s review today’s lessons from the headlines:

  • Always follow the Four Rules of firearms safety (even when you have a new holster).
  • Never point your gun at your own hand, or at someone you love, even when you have a new holster.
  • Never put a loaded gun into an unfamiliar holster. Always check it out first.
Tagged , ,
2 Comments
Purse advice

Disclaimer first: I am not a fan of off-body carry (such as in a purse, pack, or bag) unless you’ve tried everything else & truly have no other reasonable options. That said, I’ll put my collection of holster purses up against anyone’s — I have reason to believe that I own more concealment purses than any other private individual in America today! — and I can tell you a little bit about ’em.

Why do I own so many holster purses, when I’m not a fan of the basic concept? It’s simple: sometimes there really is no other way to carry the gun. I’d rather have it with me, in a less-than-ideal carry method, than to leave it at home where it won’t do me any good at all. Also, I love having insurance against a holster-related wardrobe malfunction, and a good holster purse provides the peace of mind that comes with having a backup carry method ready to go all the time.

That leaves me in an odd position: I don’t think purses make a great primary carry method, but I also think every woman who carries a gun should own a holster purse anyway. Go figure.

So, tips.

1) Get a purse that’s designed for concealed carry. Not one that has been retrofitted or altered in some way, but one that was designed from the beginning to carry the weight of the gun in a secure & accessible manner.

2) Never ever ever ever throw a “gun sleeve” over a pistol and toss it into the main compartment of an ordinary purse. That’s worse than a good-luck talisman; we have reason to believe it just attracts bad luck of the worst kind. There’s literally no way to get to that gun when you need it.

3) Look for an ambidextrous purse (if you only get one). There’s one company that advertises “ambidextrous,” but they lie. You want a purse that has a zipper at each end of the gun compartment, so it can be set up either way. Why? Because if you sprain your right wrist tomorrow, the day after that you can be set up and ready to go with your left hand — as long as you have a holster that will do it. Since you’re going to pay at least $100 (possibly $300 or more) for a holstered purse, you might as well make it able to cover you in a crisis. Once you have a purse that fits the need, ambidextrous function doesn’t matter as much.

4) Don’t worry about reinforced straps with metal in ’em. Yes, that’s a nice feature … theoretically. Realistically? Purse snatchings are violent, and a certain number of women are dragged to their deaths by their purse straps every year. The typical way this works is in a parking lot: woman walking along, purse carried crossbody or on one shoulder. Car cruises past at slow speed. Passenger reaches out the window, grabs the bag, and driver hits the gas. End of story.

More mundane circumstances, walking down the street, criminal comes up with a knife to cut the purse strap — strap does not cut. Now we have a violent criminal with a knife at bad breath distance, and you cannot let go of the purse because it’s across your body with a reinforced strap. What happens next?

5) You don’t need a locking compartment. People forget to lock them, and tragedy happens. People forget to unlock them, and tragedy happens. If you don’t want someone to have access to that firearm, don’t leave your purse lying around. That simple. If you do get a purse with a locking compartment, hide one of the keys somewhere inside your purse, so that when you lose the other one, you can still get into the compartment … eventually.

6) Positioning a Velcro-based holster is hard. Internal compartments are typically lined with soft side of Velcro; holsters are usually covered with the hook side, or at least have several strips of the scratchy stuff. Because the Velcro surfaces keep sticking together, the holsters can be hard to get in & out of the purse, and hard to adjust. Hint: place the unloaded gun inside the holster. Wrap around the outside of the holster with a stiff piece of paper. Put the wrapped holster into the gun compartment. Adjust depth & angle as needed, then pull the paper out. Problem solved.

7) There’s a trick to setting up a thumb break inside a holster purse. The goal is to make it possible to break open the retention strap by pushing with your thumb, not by pulling it off. The strap goes over the back of the slide — not over the highest part of the grip. Those two things are key.

8) Before ordering, always call and ask the company if the purse you want will work with the gun you have. There are a lot of companies out there now making smaller purses for smaller guns, and you can’t always tell from the website what you’re looking at. Also, zipper length getting into the compartment really matters.

9) No matter how fashionable or comfortable, avoid backpack holster purses. You can’t draw from ’em worth a darn.

10) The least-slow purse set up is probably a Raven from Gun Tote’n Mamas. This purse allows a rip-it-open vertical draw very similar to a well designed fanny pack. Horizontal draws work more slowly, while standard vertical draws that require you to work the zipper separately are slowest of all. A rip-it-open vertical draw works fastest with practice.

***

Brands to look at include:

Gun Tote’n Mamas (affordable, well-designed, all fully ambi, many with vertical and horizontal access options, some with reinforced straps, none with locks);

Galco (classic styles, large, locks, no reinforced straps, single access entries, permanently installed elastic holster rather than velcro);

Coronado (classic styles, different sizes, single access entries, locks, no reinforced straps);

The Concealment Shop (US-made; will custom make purse to your specs, of any size you like, in any color you like; fully lined; some with velcro entries, some with zipper entries; non-ambi but you can personalize to a lefty purse if you prefer);

Designer Concealed Carry
(high end fashion purses, well-designed insides as long as she selects a current model; fully ambi, locking entries; adjustable strap lengths; available in genuine croc & other exotic leathers)

Tagged
1 Comment
Fear and the freeze response

On the Cornered Cat Facebook page the other day, I linked to a very personal story of one woman’s experience with violence. It’s an ugly story, and a compelling one. It’s from Limatunes, and in it, she explains what happened to her shortly after her 18th birthday. You really need to read the whole thing, but here’s a short excerpt:

He grabbed me by the hair and started to push/pull me from the restaurant…. The only thought going through my head was, “This isn’t happening to me. This isn’t happening to me. Help me!” I was spending more time being astonished that he lied to me and was doing this than accepting that I was in deep trouble. I had absolutely no ability to think or act or call for help. …

As he escorted me through the patrons, I remember looking at them. If my face was pleading, I wouldn’t have known it. If I had to guess I’d say it was as blank as my mind. Frozen solid in disbelief and fear. From the outside the incident may had been a bit odd but not so alarming as to make anyone suspect what was going to happen. I didn’t even know what was about to happen. Maybe I thought he was going to tell me it was over and to go home.

I was still immobile in disbelief and fear when he got me to his van and got me inside. It wasn’t until he put a chain around my neck and locked it with a padlock that the gravity of my situation fully engulfed me.

(Read the rest of the story.)

When I posted that link on Facebook, some of Cornered Cat’s followers were a little skeptical. One posted her reaction on Fb, and a few others sent me quiet emails behind the scenes. The main question or reaction seemed to be, “How is it that no one in the restaurant knew what was going on? And why wouldn’t you call out or cry for help when there were so many people around?” One of the emails ended with, “It makes no sense.”

I agree. It does not make sense – to a logical person, hearing the story later. It probably does not make sense even to the survivor. But there is sense to be had here. Let’s see if we can unpack it a little bit.

First the easy part: the people in the restaurant did not react and stop the abduction, because they did not realize an abduction was happening. Because the victim got locked into a frozen reaction, she very literally could not struggle or cry out for help. Because she did not call for help, and because she did not struggle, the people around her did not realize she was in trouble. They probably thought it was just a minor argument, if they thought anything at all. After all, she left with him.

But that leads us to a bigger question: Why did she freeze? Why does anybody?

Freezing is a very, very common reaction to deadly danger. It is not a failure in the victim’s character or personality, but a simple survival response that our bodies learned to produce long ago. Here’s a quote from a very excellent book. The book title is, The Unthinkable: Who Survives when Disaster Strikes – and Why, and it was written by Amanda Ripley. (Highly recommended reading.)

Ripley writes:

Under certain conditions, on burning planes, sinking ships, or even impromptu battlefields, many people cease moving altogether. The decisive moment arrives, and they do nothing. They shut down, becoming suddenly limp and still. This stillness descends involuntarily, and it is one of the most important and intriguing behaviors in the disaster repertoire. It happens far more often than, say, panic…. If it is the most common behavior in the survival arc, paralysis is also among the least understood.

We already knew that part: some people freeze. But it turns out other animals freeze, too. The book continues with the story of a researcher who focused on how animals react to extreme fear:

Gallup found that paralysis could be induced in all kinds of creatures – in every single one he tested, in fact. “In a nutshell, it’s been documented in crustaceans, amphibians, frogs, lizards, snakes, birds, even mammals – wild boars to cows to primates to rats to rabbits.” Every animal seemed to have a powerful instinct to utterly shut down under extreme fear. All you had to do was make sure the animal was afraid and trapped. The more fear the animal felt, the longer it would stay “frozen.”

[snip]

It might seem like a bad idea to go limp and calm while a lion is mauling you like a chew toy. To an observer, paralysis can look a lot like a failure – as if the paralyzed animal has simply gone into shock or given up. But that would give the victim too little credit. After decades of study, Gallup has come to have enormous respect for the paralysis strategy.

Animals that go into paralysis have a better chance of surviving certain kinds of attacks. But why? Why would surrender lead to survival? Wouldn’t it tend to lead to certain death? … A lion is more likely to survive to pass on its genes if it avoids eating sick or rotten prey. Many predators lose interest in prey that is not struggling. No fight, no appetite. It’s an ancient way of avoiding food poisoning.

So that’s it for animals: sometimes they freeze as a response to extreme fear and feeling trapped. But what about humans?

Rape victims sometimes undergo something similar. About 10 percent of female sexual assault victims later report that they experienced extreme immobility during the attack, according to multiple studies by Gallup and his colleagues. A stunning 40 percent said they remembered having some kind of symptoms of paralysis – feeling ‘frozen,’ or oddly impervious to pain or cold, among other symptoms. That’s actually slightly higher than the percentage of sexual assault victims who report that they tried to fight back or flee their attackers. In other words, paralysis may be a more common response to rape than fight or flight. Unfortunately, rape victims do not usually understand what they did. Many go on to experience extreme remorse because they think they simply surrendered to their attacker, Gallup has found. “They don’t realize that what they did may have been a very adaptive reaction.” Paralysis can also make prosecution of the rapist much more difficult, since the lack of struggle may look a lot like consent.

Strangely, we have tended to dismiss our own paralysis as a kind of embarrassing meltdown, while ascribing all kinds of more interesting motives to birds. But everything we have learned from animal research suggests that it is a hardwired, adaptive response that serves a very specific purpose.

[snip]

Some people, like some animals, are clearly more likely to freeze. The behavior is built into their fear response. … The more important point, perhaps, is that the brain is plastic. It can be trained to respond more appropriately. More fear, on the other hand, makes paralysis stronger. … Less fear makes paralysis less likely. … So it makes sense that if we can reduce our own fear and adrenaline, even a little bit, we might be able to override paralysis when we need to.

Again, that extended quote above came from Amanda Ripley’s book The Unthinkable: Who Survives when Disaster Strikes – and Why.

What does all this mean? It means that a ‘freeze’ response to extreme danger isn’t some kind of personal failure. It’s just something that some people do under that kind of stress.

By this point, you may be feeling a little trapped yourself. If this kind of reaction is so common, and so hard-wired, how can we possibly escape it? Is there anything we can do when something terrifying happens to us, to break out of that cycle?

There is.

Let’s start at the beginning, and see if there are ways to perhaps avoid the frozen response to danger. According to some researchers, the freeze reaction only gets going when there are two factors involved. The first factor is fear. The second factor: feeling trapped, unable to escape. Here’s what one researcher has to say about that one. He calls it tonic immobility. “Tonic immobility is an adaptive response when one does not perceive the possibility of escaping or of winning a fight.” (Emphasis mine.)

So if you don’t feel an extreme level of fear, you probably won’t really freeze. Huh – that does not help us much. We’re talking about situations where your life is in serious danger, after all. Fear would be a perfectly reasonable response to this type of unreasonable situation. On the other hand, we’re always more fearful of things we don’t understand or have never pictured happening before. Learning a little bit about how violence develops (which is what you’re doing right now) can reduce extreme fear to more manageable levels, even in extreme situations. So can positive visualization, such as watching videos of criminal events and using those videos to picture your own successful response to a violent crime.

The other way to reduce the likelihood of a freezing reaction is to reduce or avoid the feeling that you are unable to fight back effectively. This can take a lot of different routes, but it may include carrying a gun and learning how to use it. It may include studying a martial art. Anything you do that increases self-confidence in your ability to handle yourself in a dangerous situation can reduce the chances that you will freeze in the first place. It can reduce the nature and intensity of a freeze if it does happen.

Even if a freeze does happen, there are ways to break out of it if you have learned how to do it. Since this one has already gotten too long, I’ll cover that in another post. Let me sum up very quickly what we’ve learned from the good sources above:

  • Freezing is a common response to danger, and it sometimes improves the odds of survival. But too often, it reduces the odds of survival, so we should learn to avoid it or break out of it if possible.
  • Many victims of rape and sexual assault freeze during the attack, and blame themselves later because they “gave up” or “gave in” or “didn’t fight.” A freeze reaction is none of these things, though it may feel like any or all of them.
  • There are ways to reduce the likelihood that you will freeze. These include learning more about how violent crimes happen, and learning more effective ways to respond to it.
  • There may not be any way to eliminate the freeze response entirely, because it is hard-wired. But there may be ways to break out of it – if you have learned how in advance.
Tagged , , ,
9 Comments
Ban This Song

Presented without further comment.

 

Tagged
Leave a comment
Is *your* lockbox secure?

True confessions: at SHOT Show this year, I gathered up a lot of information about different types of lockboxes for storing firearms. My goal was to get a few pages going on the Cornered Cat website on this topic. But because I refuse to write about things I don’t know, it’s taken me longer than I anticipated to pull that material together. I mean, I can always describe what I see. I could tell you “This box has blah, blah blah features…” but I don’t really have the mechanical background to judge whether something’s really secure or not. So I was studying up on lockboxes before writing about them, because I refuse to write about things I don’t know.

Turns out my caution has been well-warranted. Check out this article about “gun safes” (he means lock boxes, not full-size gun safes) by Marc Tobias at Forbes. It is lengthy, and absolutely worth the time it will take to read. Turns out that a lot of the best-known products have some security holes that concern him. There’s even a video of a three-year-old child easily breaking into some of those products.

After you’ve read that and digested it, you may also want to view the following video. This was a presentation given at a hacker convention (DefCon) in Las Vegas in 2011. It will take about 15 minutes of your time. Oh, and there are a few cuss words during the speech, so you may want to wait until the boss is out of the room before you hit the play button.

I’ll have more to say about this later, but let me tell you one thing right now: Mechanical devices can fail. No matter how you choose to secure your firearms, you must educate your children when you have guns in the home. Failing to do so can leave a gaping hole in your family’s security system, no matter where the guns are stored.

 

Tagged ,
4 Comments
Seeing the baby elephant

This post is about firearms training, and especially about instructor credentials. Honest. It’s just going to take a weird route to get there.

Let me start with a little personal background about something else entirely. I have been pregnant six times, and given birth to five children with the assistance of five different care providers in three different states. 1 Do you know what this means? It means I have a wider experience with childbirth than most people will ever receive.

Half the population (the male half) cannot get pregnant. They will never experience labor or delivery. Among women in America, roughly 20% will never have children. Of those who do, most will have only two children. And most of them will use the same hospital and same medical provider for both births.

Of course, there are many women who have had just as many or more births as I have. But I’m still toward the top end of the curve. Unusual.

Knowing that I have this unusually wide experience with childbirth, would you choose me to manage your next labor and childbirth? I hope not! Because no matter how many babies I have had, I have no medical training beyond basic first aid. The things I know about childbirth, I learned only by personal experience. I can tell you a few things that can go wrong, because I lived through them. I can tell you a few things that seemed to help make things go more easily for me. But I have not studied childbirth. I’m just a woman who had a lot of babies.

On the other hand, the medical professionals who managed three of my deliveries had never been pregnant. They had never experienced and will never experience pregnancy, miscarriage, labor, or childbirth. The doctors who performed surgery to save the life of my youngest child had no idea how that surgery felt. But they had each helped hundreds or thousands of women through labor and childbirth. They had studied the dynamics of labor, the normal outcomes and possible complications, the medical choices individual moms might face and how to help moms make the best choices possible for themselves and their babies. They knew a lot because they had studied a lot of different experiences with childbirth, even though they had never had such an experience of their own.

The women who helped at two of my deliveries were moms, so they had each been pregnant at some point. That was comforting. But their pregnancies were irrelevant in comparison to their other credentials. Don’t get me wrong! The “been there” factor definitely did help them express compassion and empathy for me when I most needed it. They answered the kinds of questions that the male doctors never could answer. But it was their other credentials — the ones they got by study, not by personal experience — that really qualified them to teach and to oversee other women’s labors.

Not only that, but without ordinary moms willing to share the most intimate secrets of their bodies with medical strangers, nobody would know the things obstetricians know. Even midwives would be useless. These childbirth professionals would have nothing to study, nothing to observe, nothing to research, nothing to learn … and no way to help anyone else. They would have no basis for anything they said about labor and delivery.

This means that childbirth professionals and care providers need the moms. They have nothing useful to say without them. Everything they teach must first be learned from people who have been pregnant and given birth.

But at the same time, each individual mom has only her own experience to go by. Even someone like me, with a really wide and varied experience with childbirth, has barely scratched the surface of directly learning what a person might need to know about having babies. The experience of giving birth helps, but it’s not all there is to the story.

What does all that have to do with firearms training and instructor credentials?

It’s like this: there are a lot of people who will tell you to take defensive firearm classes only from someone who has “seen the elephant.” Usually this means someone with a law enforcement background or military experience, someone who has dealt with life-threatening levels of violence. 2 The idea is that someone who has not been there simply cannot know what it is like. People who have “been there” have insights into the nature of violence that people who have not been there simply cannot grasp.

From my perspective, this is both true — and false.

Someone who has “been there, done that” absolutely can say things about surviving violence that no one else can say, just as a mom who has been through childbirth can tell you some things about being pregnant and having babies that a medical doctor cannot. No matter how deeply the scholar studies acts of violence and ways to survive them, until that person has come face to face with violent crime and dealt with its horrors for himself, he cannot know what it feels like or even grasp what it is. There are some things about violent encounters that can only be learned via direct, personal experience.

At the same time, though, there’s a lot more to learn in this area than any one person can ever experience directly. No matter how wide any one individual’s experience with violence might be, it won’t be nearly as wide as the whole field of possibilities. Personal experience can’t provide the same breadth of view seen by someone who has intensely studied a wide spectrum of violent events and learned from them.

Not only that, but the ordinary people who have had some personal experience with violence — no matter how minor, but especially the more extreme types of violence — these people have stories that the rest of us need to hear. A self-defense instructor needs to study personal stories of survival just as a medical doctor needs to study the experiences of women in childbirth. Without people willing to share their very personal accounts of violence with others, nobody learns anything important about the ways crime develops, or how ordinary people can effectively fight back against it.

Students often ask a prospective instructor, “Where have you been?” or,  “What have you done?” Those are good questions. But by themselves, they aren’t enough.

The really critical question is, “What have you learned?

Notes:

  1. #1 son arrived in Big City, CA via an induced labor in a hospital setting. I had a pitocin drip and an epidural that worked very well. It was an easy labor, less than ten hours start to finish. He weighed a little over 9 pounds at birth.

    I had a miscarriage at 12 weeks between my first two babies. The miscarriage happened in CA at a different hospital than either of the first two births.

    #2 son was born in Big City Suburb, CA via a spontaneous labor in a hospital setting. I had an epidural that didn’t work at all – made things worse, in fact. The labor took more than 24 hours start to finish. The labor itself was extremely rough and the delivery even rougher. The baby weighed 11 pounds at birth.

    #3 son came to us in Hot Place, AZ via a planned homebirth. The midwife – an experienced, well-trained woman without a formal medical degree – helped me manage the labor with a minimum of pain. The delivery was hard work, but not excruciating, and my son weighed almost 9 pounds.

    #4 son arrived in Small Town, WA via a planned homebirth. The midwife – a registered nurse who worked for years in a hospital setting before setting up in private practice as a midwife – suggested a few herbal teas for me to drink in the last month of pregnancy. They must have worked, because I never felt any pain at all. The first contraction hit at 7:30 that morning. Around 3 in the afternoon, experiencing regular but painless contractions, I was sitting at my kitchen table playing rummy with my parents when the midwife arrived. We stepped into the back room so she could check me. She took one look and said, “Don’t you feel like pushing?” My 10-pound son was born 15 minutes later.

    #5 son arrived in Different Small Town, WA via emergency c-section. More than two weeks before my due date, I woke up in a gushing puddle of blood, with a tearing sensation in my right side. Turned out I had placenta previa and a partial abruption. Thanks to the miracles of modern medicine, we both survived. The baby weighed a little over 8 pounds.

  2. Keep in mind, though, that many law enforcement professionals will go through an entire career without ever facing deadly-force levels of violence (although most LEOs become very, very familiar with the lower levels of force). Similarly, many soldiers have been technically “in combat” without ever shooting anyone or getting shot at. A person’s job title does not tell you what their personal experiences have actually been.
Tagged , , ,
14 Comments
Would *you* sign this petition?

There’s an old petition I stumbled across the other day. It was written in an old-fashioned kind of legalese, so I updated it a little to make it more modern. This is the gist of what it said.

***

Some truths are just obvious, so obvious that they do not require an elaborate proof, and so obvious that it is ridiculous to attempt one. Among these is the obvious truth that all human beings are equally responsible for their own consciences, behaviors, and actions. This means that all human beings have a right to live their own lives, to do whatever pleases them as long as it doesn’t interfere with the basic rights of others, and to be free to make their own decisions about their own lives.

The only real reason people agree to submit themselves to a government is to protect these basic human rights.

Thus, government comes out of the free, voluntary, and willing consent of ordinary people. The power of a government comes from the ordinary people who agree to be bound by its laws.

Because that’s where the government’s power comes from, and because the purpose of government is to protect basic human rights, it follows that whenever a government no longer protects these rights, or whenever a government begins to destroy these rights, then it is the responsibility of a good citizen to either change that government or to destroy it.

If the government does not or cannot protect basic human rights, the only moral course that a person can take is to participate in changing or abolishing the existing government.

Of course, as a practical matter, a long-standing government can’t be changed easily – and anyway, it shouldn’t be changed for minor or temporary problems. That’s simple human nature, because most people will put up with an awful lot of bad stuff before we’ll get off our rear ends and do anything about it! Especially if changing things means that … well, that things have changed. We like the familiar.

But when there’s a long and ongoing pattern of human rights abuses, and flagrant abuses of power including some people getting into office who aren’t legally qualified to do so or who cheated to get there, and there have been so many repeated offenses of this nature that it almost looks like there’s a plan to take all power away from the people and put it in the hands of bureaucrats – well, that’s when people have the right and duty to abolish the existing government. That’s when it is time to start a new government that will be more responsive to their needs and more likely to respect their rights.

 ***

Would you sign the above petition? Do you agree with it?

Tagged
29 Comments