The Cornered Cat
<— Older Posts Newer Posts —>
Mentors and friends

I love this picture. It was taken at SHOT Show in Las Vegas, which is funny because the three of us actually live within 20 miles of each other in Washington state. But let me tell you why the picture is so special to me.

Every successful woman needs three other women in her life: she needs a mentor, a sister, and a coach. If she is lucky, she might find one friend who fills all of these roles. If she is blessed beyond measure, she might find two friends who each fill these roles for her in different ways. I am blessed beyond measure.

Gila Hayes, Diane Walls, and Kathy Jackson

The woman to the left in the picture really started it all. Her name is Gila Hayes. She’s a famous gun writer, one of the best. Her book, Personal Defense for Women, provides excellent advice for staying safe and I highly recommend it. Along with her husband Marty, Gila runs two important ventures. One is the Armed Citizens Legal Defense Network, which provides legal information and assistance to people who defend themselves with deadly weapons. The other is the Firearms Academy of Seattle, where I learned to shoot.

Gila taught the first gun class I ever took, a defensive handgun class with about a dozen students in it. During that weekend, she claims, she “didn’t pay much attention” to me or my shooting, because there was another shooter on the line who needed extra help. That’s not what I remember. What I remember was that every time I needed a word of encouragement, she was at my shoulder, saying that word. Every time I needed a kick in the pants, she was there with boots on. And every time I was confused – which was a lot – she was there to untangle me and get me back on the straight and narrow. The shooting bug bit me that weekend, and it bit hard. I walked out of that class knowing two things: 1) I had learned a lot, and 2) I wasn’t done yet.

Because I’d been bitten so hard by the shooting bug, I was determined to take every class I could take. In this I was fortunate, because this school I’d wandered into by an accident of geography (it’s two miles from my front door) turned out to be one of the best and most affordable defensive firearms schools in the country. I didn’t know that at the time. I just knew it was this cool place and that the classes were – expensive. Very expensive, for a homeschool family with five kids that lived on one man’s salary. So I got creative. Over the next few years, I traded babysitting with friends and worked as an occasional carpenter’s flunky to earn money to buy classes for myself. I traded all sorts of odd jobs with friends, making these weird three-cornered barter deals so I could learn more. When I was finally up to speed enough not to be a danger to myself or others, I volunteered to do scutwork at the range during classes, hanging targets and hanging on the instructors’ every word. Eventually, I’d been hanging around long enough that Gila and Marty suggested I should become a member of the instructional staff. As an assistant instructor (I thought of myself as a very junior staff mascot), I worked through Marty’s instructor certification process. It took me two years and countless hours of practice, classes, and work to get there. And it was worth every minute.

But I was telling you about Gila. Very early in my learning process, I told Gila that I was lonely for other women and needed to hear more about other women’s experiences while they were learning to defend themselves. Men and women have very different cultural expectations around violent crime, and often have different defensive needs. Although the staff at FAS has always been extremely good with their female students, there were a lot of little tweaks I’d had to work out on my own. I wanted a place where I could learn a little more from other women. Was there a place like that? We talked about that, but at the time there really wasn’t. Two or three years later, around the time Marty invited me to come on board as an assistant instructor, Gila brought the subject back up. Would I be interested in helping lead a women’s program? Thus was born the Women’s Study Group at FAS, a program that lasted only a few years but had a lasting impact on my life.

The WSG met only occasionally, five or six times during the year. It was open only to female graduates of any class offered by FAS. The program was simple. We would usually meet in the classroom to discuss the day’s topic, then have lunch together before heading out to the range to shoot a supervised course of fire. Topics ranged from the ridiculous to the sublime, with plenty of laughter and learning along the way. We had holster shows, learned to shoot different types of guns, discussed and tested bullet penetration through various household items (Does a bookcase stop a bullet? Come and find out!). We took field trips to friends’ ranges and held mock-IDPA matches so members would feel confident when they attended the real thing. We shot in low light and with compromised vision. We shot in downed positions, such as you might use if you were knocked on your back by an attacker or if you tripped and fell while running from danger. Through all that, Gila welcomed my active participation in the planning stages and relied on me to help her run the programs smoothly. It is safe to say that if she hadn’t done that, I’d never have gotten the courage I needed to take the next step in pulling my own classes together.

She did something else, too. She persuaded me to start writing about my experiences with guns. At first it was a simple favor: would I be interested in writing gun reviews? She had an ongoing commitment to a magazine, but needed time for some other projects. Since I wanted to learn more about how to teach but had little money to buy guns for myself, this would give me an opportunity to get my hands on a lot of different guns for the wider experience an instructor should have. Grand idea! I jumped in with both feet. My first gun review appeared in Women & Guns magazine in 2004.

Waiting for the issue to arrive in the mail, I felt as if my every nerve was exposed and extended six inches or more from my actual body. It was an awful feeling. The article was terrible. Everyone was going to hate it, and me. I said as much to Gila. She calmed my nerves, reminded me that I did know what I was talking about, and said something else: “I’m proud of you.”

This is what a mentor looks like.

But we were talking about that picture. The other woman in the picture, the one in the center – that’s Diane Walls. Diane, too, is a famous gun writer. She doesn’t have a book out yet, but you can read her work in the pages of many different magazines. An accomplished martial artist, Diane came to FAS about a year and a half after I did. She was there at the first meeting of WSG. By the second year of that program, she was helping run WSG events alongside us.

Diane and her husband Tom have consistently pushed me to shoot better. They’ve been my most frequent range buddies, encouraging me to practice harder and more often. When we get together to shoot, they come with plans (“Today we’re all going to work on moving targets”) and they come prepared to work hard. Their example and encouragement – and yes, a little bit of sibling rivalry competition between us – have driven me to develop my shooting skills.

There’s something else. Diane’s experiences as a martial arts student and instructor several decades ago – a time when women just didn’t do martial arts – helped me understand the dynamics of how we were helping change the shooting world. Just by being out there, being who we are and doing what we do, we’ve helped change that culture for the better. That’s a good thing. Her experiences teaching martial arts also make her an excellent range assistant, which is why I feel so blessed that she’s agreed to travel with me to some of the classes I’ll be teaching this year.

Together, both of these women have become my mentors, my sisters, and my coaches. And they’re both going to kill me for writing this. But that is why I love this picture – and them.

Tagged
1 Comment
Lessons from the headlines #2

Here we have the story of a Good Samaritan with a gun. Police say this 61-year-old man saw a 48-year-old man chasing a woman with a knife and threatening to kill her. The GS drew his gun and ordered the man to stop. When the man didn’t stop, the GS fired a shot into the air. Then the man with the knife stopped chasing the woman and several bystanders jumped in to hold him for the cops. When the officers arrived, the woman was long gone.

Lessons? You know it!

  • “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing,” wrote Edmund Burke. 1  We can and should praise people who step in to help others in situations where lives are at risk.
  • When one person stands up, other people often jump in to help. There’s a crowd dynamic at work, a kind of group inertia that’s just waiting for a leader to set in motion. Keep that in mind if you’re ever in a situation where you find yourself looking for someone else to take charge. If no one else is stepping up, you’re the leader. Act it.
  • Where did that bullet land? Although this story ended well, warning shots are almost always a bad idea. Shooting into the air in a crowded area is an even worse idea. You are responsible for every bullet you fire, not just the ones that hit your attacker. Even in the heat of the moment, Rule #3 always applies. If you absolutely cannot make that bullet land inside the bad guy’s body, choose another spot (such as a soft piece of dirt) for the bullet to go. If you can’t do that, a bullet is not the right tool for the job.
  • Witnesses sometimes vanish, and that can include the person whose life you stepped in to save. Plan accordingly.

Notes:

  1. Or maybe not.
Tagged , , ,
Leave a comment
Lessons from the headlines #1

Here’s a news story of a self-defense shooting near a high school in Detroit. A 70-year-old male basketball coach was walking two female athletes to their cars when the group was approached by two men. Police say one of the men drew a gun and grabbed the coach by his chain necklace. The coach drew his own gun and shot both men.

Lessons? You betcha!

  • While it’s good to stick together when possible, being part of a group is not enough to guarantee that you won’t be the target of a criminal’s interest. Keep your radar up even when friends are with you.
  • If you need to draw your firearm, you may need to do so while struggling with an assailant. Drawing (and shooting) in very close quarters is a necessary skillset that’s too often overlooked.
  • Criminals often come more than one to a customer. It’s a good idea to have self-defense skills and tools that can reliably deal with more than one attacker.
  • Don’t underestimate the old guy, because guns are a great equalizer.

 

Tagged , , ,
4 Comments
Things change – and a pop quiz

I’ve long been fascinated with the history of defensive firearms training. I like to understand how different shooting techniques started, why they were created, who used them first or most effectively, and how they evolved into something else or were discarded for something better. Of course, understanding things like that is important for what I do as an instructor, but it’s also an intriguing study in its own right.

Historically, most firearms training has been for law enforcement and military applications. These fields are related to, but not identical with, the way ordinary people use defensive firearms. And when it comes to choosing which techniques and skills you need to learn, context matters. Still, there’s a lot we can learn from these sources as long as we remember that the contexts are quite different.

Lots more there to think about and explore, but I’m already off track. I just wanted an excuse to show you this cool old video, a training film from World War II. It’s about 15 minutes long, but if you don’t have that much time, just skip to 3:15 and watch for a half-minute or so. There will be a quiz later.  😉

Ready?

Pop Quiz: After watching for thirty seconds after the 3:15 mark, can you name one important way that firearms training has changed since 1944?

Tagged ,
4 Comments
Wednesday walk around the web

Jennifer tells a story that can help improve your personal safety, and that gives an excellent, excellent counterpoint to an earlier article of mine. She writes, “Slipping notes to bank tellers is not always a bad thing.” Actually, she really knocked out of the ballpark twice, once in the story above and once in a post titled, “Gun control is not pro-life.” Go read both.

Clayton Cramer asks, “What’s wrong with mandatory gun registration?” Very factual, with full citations to back up everything he says. The money quote:

If mandatory gun registration can’t be used to punish ex-felons in possession of a firearm, what purpose does such a law serve? If mandatory gun registration can only be used to punish people that can legally possess a gun, why bother? Because of the Haynes decision, if we want to punish ex-felons who are caught in possession of a gun, there are only two choices available: We must either skip registration, so that we can severely punish gun possession by those who aren’t allowed to own guns; or use the “sanitized” form of registration law — where the criminal is guaranteed that gun registration can’t hurt him, while the rest of us can be punished for failure to comply.

John Lott links to 10 Defensive Gun Uses in December 2012 – cases where the victims had to fire a lot of shots in self defense. Obviously, Lott posts these to make the political point (the one that does need to be made), but it’s also important for us to look at these cases for their practical lessons. For example, several of the events involved multiple people breaking into a home while the residents were there. Have you talked about this type of situation with your family? What’s your basic plan if someone, or a group of someones, crashes into your living room while you and your loved ones are relaxing?

David Kopel wrote The Torah and Self-Defense awhile back. Good theological meat for Jewish and Christian believers. If you haven’t really squared away your own ethical ideas about self-defense, this might be one place to start.

Texas Senator Ted Cruz wrote an amazing letter to bank officials and gun company CEOs – and cc’d Rahm Emmanuel. If you live in Texas, I congratulate you on your taste in Senators.

Julianna Crowder shares a good after-class review of Tom Givens’ Handgun Instructor course. Nice to know what goes on in those classes.

Daddybear wrote an excellent post, but the real gem on this link is found in the comments. The second comment made me laugh as hard as I’d laughed in a week.

Tagged
1 Comment
Standing together

I don’t know about you, but I’m truly tired of bad news and negative thinking. So here’s a little bit of positive action I took recently, something that made me happy to do. It cost me a little over $10 and a few minutes of my time. It was my way of thanking some people who recently stood up for our human rights when they really didn’t have to – and who stood up even though they knew that standing up would be very costly.

Did you hear about the whole brouhaha that surrounded the Eastern Sports and Outdoors Show, the one that was supposed to happen this week in Pennsylvania? That show has been cancelled. It was cancelled because the company that usually puts on the show, Reed Exhibitions,* very abruptly and unilaterally decided that there would be none of those icky AR15-style personal defense weapons allowed at their show.

Reed Exhibitions apparently believed that they could drive a dividing line between hunters and other gun owners. Reed thought the outdoors people would throw the rest of us under the bus.

They didn’t.

Instead, the outdoors community stepped up and stood up for our rights. Nearly 20% of the show’s exhibitors, and the majority of its major sponsors, cancelled their booths and decided to stay home. This includes some of the biggest names in the field, including Cabela’s and Outdoor Channel. But it also included many small companies, people for whom this one show represents the bulk of their paycheck for the entire year.

Now that’s true commitment.

The owner of one of those companies explained: “We have made the costly decision to withdraw because it is the right thing to do. We are a young company that relies on this one venue to create our operating capital for the year; however, we cannot support uninformed businesses caving to political pressures caused by broadly politicized events. We proudly support the 2nd Amendment in the capacity for which it was intended; the right of citizens to keep and bear arms. Our freedom to do so was not for hunting or competition shooting, but protection for law abiding citizens.”

Two spices from GUTNTAG: an all-purpose spice and a smoky BBQ rub. Both yummy!

When I saw that, I wondered, What can I do about this? I’m just one person, just one voice. Whatever. Then I realized that even though I can’t do everything, I can sure as heck do something.

With that thought in mind, I went poking around online until I found a list of companies that had pulled out of the show before it was cancelled. Almost at random, I pulled up a few of the names on the list and searched for the company websites. When I found a small company that looked good to me, I ordered something I could use. I’m going to keep that list handy for future use, too, because it makes me happy to help businesses that care about human rights.

Oh, and the spices I ordered? They’re really good! Based on a quick sample of the products, I can recommend GUTNTAG as a good source for yummy spices. You can find the full list of companies that supported our rights here.

 ***

* Yes, Reed Exhibitions is the same company that usually puts on the SHOT Show on behalf of the NSSF. It seems unlikely they will be doing so in future.

1 Comment
Alertness tips

As my buddy Caleb Giddings pointed out on his blog a few days ago (and as I’ve said before), it’s impossible to remain 100% alert and aware every waking moment of every day. No matter how hard you try, you simply can’t do it.

We should try anyway, because awareness is important. But because total awareness is totally impossible, we also need to build a contingency plan. That plan should take over any time you know you will focus down on some other task. For example, most of us can’t go through the day without texting a friend. That’s okay and expected. We also know that we literally cannot pay much attention to the world around us while we’re doing it. That’s okay, too — as long as we build certain habits into our “not paying attention” time. These habits can help shield us from danger.

Start smart. Before you focus down, look around. For example, in a restaurant, before you begin an intense conversation with a friend that you know will change your focus, take a walk to the back of the room. “Looking for the ladies’ room” works really well as an excuse for finding out where the exits are and who else is in the building with you. After this walk-through, the only area you’ll really need to keep an eye on is the front door. You can now (mostly) relax about other directions, which will make it easier to focus on your friend’s needs without sacrificing your own safety.

Respect the fringes. Never deliberately allow yourself a change of focus in a fringe area. What’s a fringe area? It’s a place on the way to another place — in between a crowd and a deserted place. Examples include parking lots, the long hallway at the back of the mall, the unpopulated area behind the rides at the fairgrounds, or a quiet back room at a noisy house party. These areas tempt us when we’re looking for privacy to make that quick phone call, but it’s not a good idea. Fringe areas attract criminals, because fringes promise a steady supply of potential victims but also a degree of privacy.

Secure your belongings. Of course, it’s ideal if you can store your “I’m not paying attention” self safely behind a locked door. But if you can’t do that, you can at least put your belongings where you can more easily protect them before you lose focus. Don’t allow yourself to zone out with your purse out of arm’s reach, for example, or shove your iPod across the table to make room for the meal when you’re eating alone. Instead, keep your belongings close to you, where someone would have to physically disturb you in order to snatch them.

Change the angles. If possible, put a wall behind you. Better still, move into a corner. There’s two reasons for this. First, having that wall in the way makes it a little harder for a maybe-a-bad-guy to approach you with plausible deniability, the way he can when you’re standing in the open (hey, maybe he was just walking past…) The second reason is a visual.

When you’re standing in the open, trouble can approach from any direction.

 

When you put your back against a wall, you reduce the size of your awareness problem.

 

Stepping into a corner allows you to more safely focus down, with only a small area of concern to watch.

Overlook your friends. Speaking of angles, try this one on for size: set a new social rule with your friends, one that says, “It’s totally okay with me if you look over my shoulder sometimes. In fact, I want you to!” Here’s why (it’s another visual):

When you have a trusted friend, you can watch each other’s back — cutting your 360-degree awareness problem in half.

Look out! Sometimes it feels like you just have to walk and text. Maybe you and your friends are going to meet up with someone else, and you’re the designated message-sender. Or the group navigator. Whatever. You know perfectly well you’re going to keep your feet moving with the crowd, not demand everyone stop and humor you. What to do? Tell them this story: You totally know this woman who actually walked into a post when she was trying to read while walking! (Yeah, that’s me. In my defense, I was six years old, but they don’t have to know that.) So here’s what you want your friends to do: you want them to promise you, really promise you, that they won’t let you get surprised by anything while you’re paying attention to your phone. They’ll spot the other people and warn you those people are there. They’ll tell you when the group approaches a curb, or a light post, or a pothole, or whatever. Because it would be really embarrassing to fall into a manhole in the middle of the street just because you didn’t notice it.

Watch the time so you don’t get buried. Inside every activity – whether it’s texting, adding up the restaurant bill, reading a book, whatever – some attention breaks naturally happen. Use those breaks to catch up with the outside world. When you text, waiting for your friend to respond is a good time to look around. When adding up a bill or counting your change, instead of staring at your palm, you can look around with a thoughtful air while you’re adding the numbers. When reading a book, it’s natural to take a mental breather at chapter and division headings, but you can also look around between short scenes. Savor your reading! Don’t rush through it with hyperfocused lack of awareness.

Use your kids. Children very naturally notice the world around them, and will comment (a lot!) on what they see if you let them. Encourage that tendency. Not only can it help you during the immediate moment, but it’s also a good habit for them to keep for life. With you cheering them on, they won’t have to relearn the art of awareness as adults. Meanwhile, try playing games such as “I Spy” with your kids, which will help you remind yourself that you need to look around.

Notice the good people. Life feels more pleasant when we look for the good things, and it’s a joy to see what others are up to. Not only this, but sometimes the first indication of trouble is the reaction of good people to the bad guy you couldn’t or didn’t see. So don’t get in the habit of glancing past people you’ve mentally flagged as “not a problem.” Pay attention to their body language, and if they look tense or upset, try to figure out why.

Listen up! In public places, you can hear a constant hum of human activity: the low buzz of people visiting with each other, the background music in the office or elevator, the sound of moving feet along the sidewalk. Make a habit of really hearing this noise as often as you can. This sets up a subconscious radar that will ping whenever there’s a change in atmosphere, intensity, or volume – prompting you to turn your focus outward and find out what’s going on.

Know when to relax. We’ve all met ‘that guy.’ The one who can’t seem to let it go no matter where he is or what he’s doing. The one who expects trouble behind every blade of grass and who can’t ever dial his tension level back. He’s on the fast track to a heart attack, and you’re a nervous wreck hanging out with him. Don’t be That Guy! Once you have set your outer boundaries in place, whatever they are, take a deep calming breath and relax. Life is good.

 ***

Edited to add: Hat tip to A Girl and Her Gun for the pointer to Caleb’s article. I’d have seen it eventually, but she pointed the way first!

13 Comments
Pistols as assault weapons

A few days ago, I promised to do my bit to educate people about what’s going on, and why it matters, and how it might affect our ability to protect ourselves from violent crime. So here’s something interesting you may not have heard yet.

The proposed version of the new federal “Assault Weapons” Ban, as written right now, would make it illegal to buy or own several of America’s most popular handguns. This would include all Glock models at the very least, and possibly Beretta 92 and Taurus PT 92 … and even some 1911 models might be at risk.

You might wonder, why would anyone try to ban these particular guns? It’s because each one of these semiautomatic guns has a full-auto counterpart of the same basic design. Of course, the full-auto ‘machine gun’ versions are already either highly-regulated or outright illegal, depending where you live and when the gun in question was manufactured. (If it’s newer than 1986, it’s illegal period.)

If you’re anything like me, you probably did not even know any of those guns had a full-auto version. But for the people on the anti-rights side, the goal right now seems to be eliminating anything that looks like a gun the military could use. From that perspective, it makes sense to ban even the very common and practical handguns that have military counterparts.

If I wanted to rant, I could point out that the 2nd Amendment was specifically written to protect the right of ordinary people to own military weapons and military-style weapons.* But that’s not my point here. Nor am I going to point out that this huge grab was almost certainly tossed in so the anti-rights people can later claim they were willing to “compromise” about something during the legislative process.

Never mind all that. Let’s just stick with the important part: the “Assault Weapons” bill currently proposed by Sen. Feinstein would make it functionally illegal to import, sell, manufacture, transfer, or possess some of the most popular handguns in America. That’s a bad thing.

This proposed ban is not just about scary black rifles. It’s about some of the simplest, most common, and most effective handguns we carry for self defense. That’s worth thinking about.

 

Edited to add: You can read a little more information about the proposal at DaddyBear’s Den. The link goes to a quick summary with cogent rant-points. Useful if you’re looking for things to tell your friends or (better!) your elected representatives.

***

* Don’t believe me? Here’s a rabbit hole for you: the much maligned 1939 Miller case that went to the Supreme Court. A quote: “In the absence of any evidence tending to show that possession or use of a ‘shotgun having a barrel of less than eighteen inches in length’ at this time has some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia, we cannot say that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear such an instrument. Certainly it is not within judicial notice that this weapon is any part of the ordinary military equipment, or that its use could contribute to the common defense.” In other words, if it had been a military weapon, one in common military use or that could be useful in a military setting, the Court of that time and in that place would almost certainly have found the weapon protected under the 2nd Amendment. Nobody brought evidence to the Court that said a short-barrel shotgun could be useful in a military way, so the Court could not and did not rule on those grounds.

1 Comment